本帖最後由 tamimislam55555 於 2024-5-15 16:24 編輯
Some examples of results from the sites of well-known companies We believe that to put the situation into context, it is now appropriate to provide an overview of the ratings that the various sites in the network can receive, just to give a general idea. Let's start with the 4 most successful teams in the history of Formula 1, who should know a lot about performance and speed . Snapshot of ferrari.com results on web.dev/measure Sum of the 4 scores: 267 Snapshot of mclaren.com results at web.dev/measure Sum of the 4 scores: 306 Snapshot of mercedes-benz.
com results at web.dev/measure Sum of the 4 scores: 270 Sna Norfolk Island Email List pshot of williamsf1.com results at web.dev/measure Sum of the 4 scores: 327 Some might argue that Ferrari would sell even if it didn't even have a website and therefore it isn't important to them. No one who has a vague idea of the corporate function of marketing can hold such an opinion, but we fear that beliefs of this type are unfortunately still widespread ( pat-pat on the shoulders of marketers who have to live with and fight with them on a daily basis ). So let's look at the measurements of the sites of companies most linked to the web , which without the internet would be something completely different or wouldn't even exist: Snapshot of amazon.
com results at web.dev/measure Sum of the 4 scores: 351 Snapshot of apple.com results at web.dev/measure Sum of the 4 scores: 335 Snapshot of microsoft.com results at web.dev/measure Sum of the 4 scores: 301 Snapshot of netflix.com results at web.dev/measure Sum of the 4 scores: 326 What can be gleaned from this summary overview is that achieving the highest scores is not easy , not even for Big Corp. What is needed is first of all awareness of the importance of these aspects, and then their extreme consideration in every aspect and at every stage of the life cycle of a website, from its conception, to the choice of the technological stack, up to its decommissioning and replacement due to obsolescence.
|